| Public Gallery Help | |||
| |||||
| Sign the Guestbook. Displaying 2 of 2 entries. | |||||
Hi Jere, sorry for the late reply, but I haven´t looked at this archive for more than a year. I bought the Tamron 28-75/2.8 after this test, mainly because it´s better and more compact than most other zooms I have ever tried. There´s no doubt that the Canon 24-70/2.8 L is more durable and more environmentally sealed, and it´s actually also better shooting directly against the light. E.g. at a concert where you might have spotlights shining directly into your lens. However as long as you don´t have that extreme situation, I find the Tamron lens is hard to beat. Personally I don´t miss the extreme wide which is the popular demand, because I don´t care for the perspective deformation which comes with the usual 18 to this and that which has become the "normal" zoom for APS sensor reflex cameras. Although the Canon lens is one of the toughest built, I can say the Tamron is not a bad build either. Just a few days after I bought it, I tried on a new strap and it slipped out of the lug in the left side of the camera, so the camera dropped from about 1,4 metres onto my wooden floor, hitting it directly on tip of the lower petal of the sunshade. I thought for sure the lens as well as my EOS 350 was done for, but to my great surprise only the sunshade was cracked. Nothing whatsoever happened to the lens or camera. I didn´t even bother to order a new sunshade. A bit of gaffer tape fixed it. Call me a cheap skate if you like :-D - Jens Otto Nielsen, Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:25PM | |||||
Hi, Quite intresting test you have here. I have looked through quite a few these 24-70L vs 28-75 tests, but all of them have had different results. What i would liked to see here how both lenses compares throught entire range from 28-70 at 2.8. Just intrested in these tests, because i have few months to decide which one to buy. Build, weather sealing, focus speed, and accuracy are things why i would choose Canon over Tamron, but if Canon is worse wide open than Tamron i will have to consider again is those other things worth paying extra 1000€. - Jere Keskiaho | http://rele.pp.saunalahti.fi, Fri, 24 Mar 2006 2:56AM | |||||