• Public Gallery  • Help  
• Join Now!  • Log In  • Feature Tour
Tamron vs Canon
Canon 24-70/2.8 L compared to Tamron 28-75/2.8 on the Canon EOS 1 Ds

This is a direct comparison of the Canon prestige mid-range fast zoom lens, and the new Tamron XR DI, especially designed for digital photography. The images were shot inside Roskilde Cathedral, using daylight through the cathedral windows. Overcast and extremely dull, this nordic winter light is a serious challenge for a photographer. Evidently the lenses aren´t centered identically, and the focal lenght of 50 mm seems wider on the Tamron lens, but since I don´t have any measuring instruments I couldn´t tell which lens is correctly centered. While the Canon lens is built like a tank, the Tamron build is not poor, and seems to function as fast and equally silent (The Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 is audible however, compared to the silent Canon lenses.) The size/weight difference is considerable, in favor of Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8. Surprisingly, at less than half price of the Canon lens, the Tamron comes out with better contrast at full aperture. The Tamron lens seems "warmer". I could have adjusted this in the raw processing software, but chose not to, in order to display the color difference you would experience using lenses from both manufacturers alongside eachother. Which tone is more pleasing is a matter of taste I guess. I used the same raw processing procedure for all the first 8 images, without color tint, and set to 3800 kelvin, calibrated from the first Canon image.

Not appreciating that the cheaper lens came out best at full aperture, I decided to make the test again next day, this time trying to frame more accurately, to get an idea about the difference in actual focal lenght, and later when I processed the images, I chose to calibrate the raw processing to the Tamron lens, at 4000 kelvin, making a slight adjustment for magenta, making it as pleasing as possible to my eye, taking the existing light in consideration, only 1,5 hour before sunset on a dull winter day. Again examining the images at full aperture, it´s a fact that contrast is better in the Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 at the full lens opening, but only slightly. Colours seem a bit more saturated in Tamron XR DI. Whichever is more "neutral" is a scientific discussion I don´t want to get into. Both lenses produce extremely satisfying results. Test object is the beautifully carved alabast/marble figurines on the sides of the magnificent sarcophagus of Queen Margrethe 1, who unified all of Scandinavia in the 13th century, and who is laid to rest in a choir behind the altar of the Unesco World Heritage, Roskilde Cathedral, from the 12th century. Between the two tests are some of the medieval wood carvings flanking the altar and the sarcophagus. The rest of the images are from the altar, and the other royal burial chambers surrounding the Cathedral. Most of them are shot with the excellent Tamron XR DI 180/3.5. Unfortunately I didn´t have the similar Canon lens available for comparison. Finishing up the archive, there are a few images shot outside with Tamron XR DI 180/3.5. Inside images are shot on tripod at 100 iso, outside, hand held at 400 iso. To see the full sized 11 mp image, click on Original, at the bottom of the image that comes up after you click the thumbnail.
Date(s): January 31, 2004. Album by Jens Otto Nielsen. 1 - 39 of 39 Total. 4524 Visits.
  Sign the Guestbook. Displaying 2 of 2 entries.
Hi Jere, sorry for the late reply, but I haven´t looked at this archive for more than a year. I bought the Tamron 28-75/2.8 after this test, mainly because it´s better and more compact than most other zooms I have ever tried. There´s no doubt that the Canon 24-70/2.8 L is more durable and more environmentally sealed, and it´s actually also better shooting directly against the light. E.g. at a concert where you might have spotlights shining directly into your lens. However as long as you don´t have that extreme situation, I find the Tamron lens is hard to beat. Personally I don´t miss the extreme wide which is the popular demand, because I don´t care for the perspective deformation which comes with the usual 18 to this and that which has become the "normal" zoom for APS sensor reflex cameras.  Although the Canon lens is one of the toughest built, I can say the Tamron is not a bad build either. Just a few days after I bought it, I tried on a new strap and it slipped out of the lug in the left side of the camera, so the camera dropped from about 1,4 metres onto my wooden floor, hitting it directly on tip of the lower petal of the sunshade. I thought for sure the lens as well as my EOS 350 was done for, but to my great surprise only the sunshade was cracked. Nothing whatsoever happened to the lens or camera. I didn´t even bother to order a new sunshade. A bit of gaffer tape fixed it. Call me a cheap skate if you like :-D
 - 
Jens Otto Nielsen, Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:25PM
Hi,

Quite intresting test you have here. I have looked through quite a few these 24-70L vs 28-75 tests, but all of them have had different results. What i would liked to see here how both lenses compares throught entire range from 28-70 at 2.8. Just intrested in these tests, because i have few months to decide which one to buy. Build, weather sealing, focus speed, and accuracy are things why i would choose Canon over Tamron, but if Canon is worse wide open than Tamron i will have to consider again is those other things worth paying extra 1000€.
 - 
Jere Keskiaho | http://rele.pp.saunalahti.fi, Fri, 24 Mar 2006 2:56AM
Start Slideshow 
Enlarge photo 1
enlarge 226KB, 1024x681
1
E47S2994 ca 50 28
Canon EF 24-70 L F1:2.8/50 mm

Enlarge photo 2
enlarge 227KB, 1024x681
2
E47S3000 ta 50 28
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:2.8/50 mm

Enlarge photo 3
enlarge 237KB, 1024x681
3
E47S2996 ca 50 40
Canon EF 24-70/2.8 L F1:4.0/50 mm

Enlarge photo 4
enlarge 240KB, 1024x681
4
E47S3001 ta 50 40
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8  F1:4.0/50 mm

Enlarge photo 5
enlarge 239KB, 1024x681
5
E47S2997 ca 50 56
Canon EF 24-70/2.8 L F1:5,6/50mm

Enlarge photo 6
enlarge 240KB, 1024x681
6
E47S3002 ta 50 56
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:5.6/50mm

Enlarge photo 7
enlarge 242KB, 1024x681
7
E47S2998 ca 50 80
Canon EF 24-70/2.8 L F1:8.0/50 mm

Enlarge photo 8
enlarge 239KB, 1024x681
8
E47S3003 ta 50 80
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:8.0

Enlarge photo 9
enlarge 196KB, 1024x681
9
E47S3045 75 11
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:11/75 mm

Enlarge photo 10
enlarge 208KB, 1024x681
10
E47S3047 75 11
Tamron XR DI 75/2.8 F1:11/75 mm

Enlarge photo 11
enlarge 213KB, 1024x681
11
E47S3048 75 11
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:22/75 mm

Enlarge photo 12
enlarge 198KB, 1024x681
12
E47S3051 75 11
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:22/75 mm

Enlarge photo 13
enlarge 233KB, 1024x681
13
E47S3064 ta 60 28
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:2.8/60 mm

Enlarge photo 14
enlarge 233KB, 1024x681
14
E47S3072 ca 57 28
Canon 24-70/2,8 L F1:2.8/57 mm

Enlarge photo 15
enlarge 249KB, 1024x681
15
E47S3066 ta 60 56
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:5.6/60 mm

Enlarge photo 16
enlarge 247KB, 1024x681
16
E47S3074 ca 57 56
Canon 24-70/2.8 L F1:5.6/57 mm

Enlarge photo 17
enlarge 245KB, 1024x681
17
E47S3068 ta 60 11
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2,8 F1:11/60 mm

Enlarge photo 18
enlarge 248KB, 1024x681
18
E47S3076 ca 57 11
Canon 24-70/2.8 L F1:11/57 mm

Enlarge photo 19
enlarge 238KB, 1024x681
19
E47S3070 ta 60 22
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2,8 F1:22/60 mm

Enlarge photo 20
enlarge 239KB, 1024x681
20
E47S3078 ca 57 22
Canon 24-70/2.8 L F1:22/57 mm

Enlarge photo 21
enlarge 255KB, 1024x681
21
E47S3053 56 22
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:22/56 mm

Enlarge photo 22
enlarge 267KB, 681x1024
22
E47S3054 75 22
Tamron XR DI 28-75/2.8 F1:22/75 mm

Enlarge photo 23
enlarge 234KB, 681x1024
23
E47S3057 180 22
Tamron XR DI 180/3,5 F1:22

Enlarge photo 24
enlarge 92KB, 681x1024
24
E47S3013 ta 180 35
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:3.5

Enlarge photo 25
enlarge 101KB, 681x1024
25
E47S3018 ta 180 11
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:11

Enlarge photo 26
enlarge 112KB, 681x1024
26
E47S3021 ta 180 32
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:32

Enlarge photo 27
enlarge 88KB, 681x1024
27
E47S3022 ta 180 35
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:3.5

Enlarge photo 28
enlarge 120KB, 681x1024
28
E47S3028 ta 180 32
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:32

Enlarge photo 29
enlarge 179KB, 1023x893
29
E47S3032
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:32

Enlarge photo 30
enlarge 144KB, 1024x681
30
E47S3033 ta 180 32
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:32

Enlarge photo 31
enlarge 205KB, 1024x681
31
E47S3042 ta 180 32
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:32

Enlarge photo 32
enlarge 211KB, 681x1024
32
E47S3080 180 22
Tamron XR DI 180/3,5 F1:22

Enlarge photo 33
enlarge 211KB, 681x1024
33
E47S3081 180 22
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:22

Enlarge photo 34
enlarge 189KB, 681x1024
34
E47S3082 180 22
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:22

Enlarge photo 35
enlarge 144KB, 681x1024
35
E47S3086 180 50
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:5.0

Enlarge photo 36
enlarge 128KB, 1024x681
36
E47S3092 180 50
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:5.0

Enlarge photo 37
enlarge 85KB, 681x1024
37
E47S3093 180 45
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:4.5

Enlarge photo 38
enlarge 176KB, 1024x681
38
E47S3099 180 63
Tamron XR DI 180/3.5 F1:6.3

Enlarge photo 39
enlarge 195KB, 681x1024
39
E47S3102 180 56
Tamron XR DI 180/3,5 F1:5.6